"If your actions inspire others to dream more, do more and become more, you are a leader." -- John Quincy Adams
The sirens are going off again. Can you hear them? Sounds like the intro to Black Sabbath's classic, "War Pigs." The song has been circulating airwaves for the better part of four decades now and has been converting generation after generation of new listeners along the way. The sirens, on the other hand, have been sounding off for several millenniums. And judging by the latest books in route to the publishers, the sirens will continually be heard.
The sirens are warning us about engagement levels in the workplace. They are crunching numbers, counting beans, and taking notes on how much production is theoretically lost by relatively low employee engagement. Some estimates state the overall cost to the U.S. economy is around half a trillion dollars a year. We could probably (thinking optimistically) bring Detroit back from the gallows with that kind of money. Throw in Cleveland too as a bonus. Surely a solution, some type of remedy must exist, right?
We could tighten the ratchets down on the old school 20th Century approach to management - the good ole carrot and stick. Dangle a bigger, shinier new carrot closer in front of our fellow employees. Keep them tirelessly reaching for the light at the end of the tunnel and if they get too close, buy more tunnel. Or we could sharpen the stick to a fine point to ensure nobody dares lag behind. People will receive the message loud and clear, right?
C'mon, this is the 21st Century already! Surely we, the human race, should have this down to a science. Engagement levels should be humming along smoothly at the top with little to no waste like a new car engine running off sea water. Why do we seem to be regressing as time marches on?
The sirens sound off louder and closer than ever. We are all familiar with the sound. We are able to interpret the warning; yet, our collective actions leave overwhelming empirical proof that we are clearly not doing enough to silence the sirens. And let's be clear, the sirens are solely about one function: leadership.
Many pages have been and will be written on the subject of leadership. Therefore, we will only cover five of the main topics I feel are most important: Leadership ≠ Management, Movement versus Motivation, Champion, Integrity, and Sales (not just for Salespersons).
Leadership ≠ Management
These two words are used so often interchangeably that they must be synonymous, right? Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong on two fronts: A) Having a management title puts you in a position of leadership but does not automatically classify you as a great leader. B) Reread the quote at the top of this post: no title is needed to be a leader period. Furthermore, you can be a great leader with no formal title of authority whatsoever.
In an ideal world, every single person put into a formal management role would be vetted inside and out on their leadership skills first and foremost before even being remotely considered for the position. However, we all know that is not the case in the real world. Whether promoted to the ranks by nepotism, cronyism, Peter Principle, or pure incompetence from management levels above; we all have been victims, witnessed, heard, or read about these poor leaders. Promoted to the ranks of management alone is not predictive of what kind of leader that person will be.
Management is important and necessary - someone needs to keep the ship in line.Without any structure, standardization goes out the window as well as best practices among the group. Therefore, we need good managers to keep the finger on the pulse and monitor the ship to ensure it stays on course.
People, however, do not wake up, stretch out, and say, "I can't wait to be managed today!" Reports can be managed, as well as metrics, email, workload capacity, and so on. These are all things though. People want to be led not managed.
Management, in itself, is keeping with the status quo - enforcing current active policies and procedures. Color inside the lines serves its purpose. However, managing too well has the crippling ability to extinguish an environment ripe for innovation. Leading is about reaching outside the boundaries and pioneering new fronts. Stressing too much inside-the-lines thinking kills the very spirit of the heart of leadership - challenging the status quo. In today's high speed, ever changing environment, leadership is more important than ever. Complacency is the enemy and when one manages too well, they should not be the least bit surprised when their people set up camp and establish residency in their own comfort zone. Great leaders in management fully understand this and push their people to further develop themselves.
Speaking of pushing people, how you do so is of paramount importance. In the military, I had the experience of looking at people at uniform and having their rank noticeably visible. If they outranked you, you did what you were told and filed a grievance later if you felt it was unjustified. Not all leadership in the military was this poor, but it certainly did exist. Donning a uniform or management title will create movement among your reports - people have proven they can and will endure a lot to keep their jobs. However, movement is not motivation.
Movement v. Motivation
Frederick Herzberg, clinical psychologist and pioneer of 'job enrichment,' wrote about the distinction between movement and motivation in the most popular Harvard Business Review article in its history, "One More Time: How Do you Motivate Employees?" Herzberg, in a nutshell, classified movement as a "kick in the ass (K.I.T.A.)" - management uses punishments and rewards (carrots & sticks) as a means to push their employees. Motivation, on the other hand, is the result of such factor as recognition, nature of the job itself (job enrichment), sense of achievement, responsibility, and promotion rate.
Both movement and motivation look a lot alike to the outside observer. After all both can and do produce the intended results. However, they are fundamentally different. Think of movement as a battery within you that cannot hold a charge. An external source is constantly needed to feed your battery and keep you moving. Those external sources often look a lot like a golden carrot dangled just in front of your face or a razor sharp pointy stick merely inches behind you. Whereas motivation is a battery equipped with its own charger inside you. External sources are not needed. Not only can you charge your own battery, the charge you produce is powerful enough to charge other's batteries - power an entire grid.
Great leaders know how to the distinguish the two apart. They do not worry about "when the cats are away the mice will play" scenarios. They help create leaders in all who they lead.
Stephen Covey, author of "7 Habits of Highly Effective People," spoke about about two levels people fall under: dependent and independent. Dependent people rely upon other to take care of them. Independent people make their own decisions and take care of their selves. One of the main goals of leadership is to create what Covey refers to as "interdependence" - cooperation among independent people that leads to higher achievements that cannot be be achieved independently.
Movement and dependence go hand in hand. If a leader actually wants to continually make the effort to move those they lead, they should not be the least surprised when those followers never reach independence. Just keep cracking the whip and wondering why you have to.
Independent people are key to any growth sustained over the long term. This is what every leader should grade themselves upon. Great leadership is about how many people you helped build not how many bodies left in your wake. Champion your people and your legacy will write itself.
Champion
I see a lot of praise for executive leaders across the board for all the money they saved their companies, how much money made for their investors/shareholders, and how much they should be revered around the globe. We have created rock star individuals and placed them on the highest pedestals. Of course, we also have the base of the pyramid with absolutely no shortage of people who want so badly to emulate these leaders in hopes they will reach the same holy ground someday.
People can and do accomplish amazing feats no doubt about it. However, I know from my own experiences (much lesser feats like successfully finishing marathons) that I sure as hell did not accomplish them alone. And if I did have to train for another one and handle it all by myself with no support, I know the chances of succeeding would be quite low. Therefore, I hold very little belief and whole lot of doubt that any of these rock stars, anointed by the media and their peers, accomplished their own feats alone. Furthermore, how did they accomplish their feats? In business, do they land at the desk of CFO by means of chopping heads to keep their numbers looking solid? Do they operate by the ends justify the means philosophy? Well, I have a problem with that -- we are not means.
Here's to hoping that everyone has equal opportunity to become the best leaders they can be and reach their full potential. One of the sweetest features in life is being able to witness our own or someone else's successes. One of the most sour aspects of life is witnessing others (or, forbid, ourselves) race towards their goals without regards to how they arrived there -- how they affect the people around them in the process. Great leaders never sacrifice the means just to meet their ends. The means are everything. Great leaders do not worry about how many books will be written in their honor and if they will be worshiped as an idol. Great leaders sleep soundly at night knowing that they have no blood to scrub off their hands. They have a clear conscience because great leaders champion those they lead.
Anyone with the slightest bit of ambition has a natural tendency to prove to themselves they can do what they set out to do on their own. We want to make our own grade. Great leaders encourage us and inspire us to take risks and set out to do above and beyond anything we have accomplished to date. They realize that our successes further define their own successes. Altruism mixed with a hint of self interest. Not a bad thing. Great coaches develop their players and as the players come into their own the coaches brag, loudly and proudly, about them. Why does it seem that this only applies to sports?
Great leaders dig deep and take a genuine interest in everyone they lead. They understand them well and know how to capitalize and build on their strengths. Pride is about helping them achieve feats they never felt on their own possible before being exposed to your leadership. I want to read about the phenomenal leaders who have built up so many around them. Want to read about them much more often than any numbers Wall Street cares about. If you are in a leadership position and are not championing your people, what is your excuse?
For clarification purposes, I purposely chose the term "champion" over recognition. Recognition is an important aspect of leadership and should be honored whenever possible. Most leaders know effective ways of recognizing those they lead. Championing would be best described as how Ken Blanchard & Sheldon Bowles' defined "Deliver Plus One" in their book "Raving Fans." Meaning to not just stop at just simple recognition -- go the extra mile and be a rock in their corner. Have some integrity.
Integrity
"If you don't stick to your values when they're being tested, they're not values: they're hobbies." - Jon Stewart
We have all heard that knowing is half the battle. Yes, knowing the key ingredients to great leadership is not to be downplayed. However, the level of difficulty goes from novice to ninja when the high winds from the storm reach the sea. No practice scenario will adequately prepare you for everything and anything that can come your way. Are you strong enough to persevere and lead through tough unforeseen situations?
Without integrity, one will never be measured as a great leader by any standard of the definition. If a leader's integrity is in question, so is their credibility and character. All bets are off. Those being led will see right through the facade and run for cover in a heartbeat. Good luck shaking that reputation if you should fall on this front.
Inaction is worse than making the wrong decision(s) during a crisis. People will forgive bad decisions from a leader especially given the circumstances just as long as the decision(s) were made with the best intentions. However, inaction is a cop out. A great leader keeps a solid finger on the pulse at all times and recognizes when things are amiss. They do not bury their heads in the sand or worse: switch to self-preservation mode. Great leaders step up and take action with little regard to the politics involved.
Politics. Nothing will damage the reputation of a leader more than playing the game of politics. Telling people what you think they want to hear and not being the least bit transparent serves no other purpose than that person's self interest. Integrity will crumble under the weight of one's values being sold out in the name of politics. Politics are the results of not effectively dealing with complex human social interactions (interpersonal communication). No question politics invade just about every single social circle in existence. Selling people on tough, personal matters is hard work. Punching the ticket to great leadership was never sold as easy trip. If the road to exceptional leadership was straight and narrow, we would have saved an Amazon worth of trees from being printed into the plethora of books on the subject.
Speaking of selling people on...
Sales
If you are like I was in not-so-distant past, you may be scratching your head as to why Sales would be on any list of main topics about leadership. Then I read Daniel Pink's stellar book: "To Sell Is Human: The Surprising Truth About Moving Others" and shortly after Chip and Dan Heath's book: Switch: How to Change Things When Change is Hard." Now it is clear to me -- selling is a skill every aspiring leader should be schooled in.
Like it or not even if you do not consider yourself a leader, you are a salesperson. A product or service you may never have to pedal, but you do have ideas. Ideas that cannot be initiated by yourself -- need a buy-in. You also have wants - how do you persuade others to go along? I want my kids to go to bed on time to ease the pain and hassle of waking them up in the morning (and to have at least a couple hours of sanity before I too go to sleep). In order to do so, I must convince them to quit stalling and just embrace the shuteye. We are constantly selling whether we realize it or not.
As mentioned earlier, leading is about challenging the status quo. Navigating uncharted waters. Change. I guarantee it is a hell of a lot easier to peddle vacuum cleaners to individuals than to close the deal on wholesale change to an entire group. Selling change is the hallmark of great leadership. Do yourself a great big favor and read the two aforementioned books if you have not read them already. Well worth your time.
Are you a leader or in a position that implies leadership? Here is a good exercise to either calibrate or re-calibrate your leadership skills: ask yourself: why would anyone want to follow your lead? Then work on your campaign to sell those you wish to lead on it.
"Leadership is a choice, not a rank." - Simon Sinek
We are all leaders to some degree or another. We all have the power to influence others, ourselves, our children. Do we not owe it to ourselves and those we lead to be the best leaders we can be? Hopefully this proved to be either enlightening or a refresher to help us become even better leaders than we already are. I have not held a position of authority since my last year in the Navy. However, I do not need to be on the top of any given ladder to have a good understanding of fundamental leadership principles. Nobody needs to and no one should wait until reaching a ranked position to learn them. The better we are understanding and exercising sound leadership, the better our environment will be. Understanding the principles will make you more likely to demand better leadership from those whom lead you and yourself in leading others. We may not be able to silent the sirens overall but with enough concerted effort, we just might be able to mute them in our region.
S.H.A.P.E. Philosophy is about building a better tomorrow for all. The only way to do so is look out for one another and embrace the humanity. We are all part of the same tribe - together we can thrive. Whereas, individually, we merely survive. Life is too short to just get by surviving. Great leadership is key.